There is a constant that fools and the politically correct refuse to grasp because it means they must face what for them is the unpleasant truth. That constant, i.e., truth is, the majority of Muslims aren’t about assimilation. They are about segregation, conquest, and subjugation.
Islam is not a religion; it is an ideology. An ideology that doesn’t’ have identifiable markings apart from dress. Consider London; recent news reports state there are 23,000 Jihadists in the United Kingdom. How do you identify them from the so-called “peaceful” Muslims?
The mistake repeated over and over is foolishly believing if we are nice and accepting of them they will like us and we can all gather around the campfires signing Kumbaya.
Nothing could be further from the truth. It is a truism that in difficult times, difficult measures must be taken. Apparently Paris, Germany, the UK and many in America haven’t receive that memo, so to speak.
We are in a contest of wills against an enemy that can hide in plain sight going about attending little league games and office parties until the very second they are instructed (or decide) to slaughter us. The problem, is that Muslims have the resolve to carry out their mission of conquest by global Jihad and civilized countries haven’t the resolve to do what it takes to stop them.
The truth, (read facts), can only be ignored for so long. There is not one acre of ground on earth where there are Muslims that there isn’t terrorism and violent malcontents. Because places like Paris and the UK are unwilling to take whatever unpleasant steps necessary to combat this evil, their citizens are slaughtered in the streets and their wives and daughters are raped and brutalized.
Burying one’s head in the sand pretending this isn’t the case is the reasoning of fools.
It is accurate to say that not all Muslims are killer terrorists and Jihadists. But how do you tell by looking, which one is and which one isn’t. Therein lies the rub.
Extreme measures must be taken to ensure our safety. And in taking said extreme measures it stands to reason that peaceful Muslims will be protected as well.
Being nice, being accommodating, trying to be understanding, etc. has a historical record of failure. Virtually everything we represent is an offense worthy of death according to their ideology.
I am unapologetically anti-homosexuality, but I do not believe homosexuals should be thrown from rooftops and/or stoned to death. But Islam does. Exactly how long do in your face women’s groups think they would be allowed to exist under Islam rule?
Like the UK and Paris, America takes tepid steps to protect We the People. Authorities are always on the back foot so-to-speak. We are always reacting to some act of terror or threat of same. How often are we proactive? How often is our security response ahead of the planned act of terrorism?
Not long ago I tweeted that I would stop saying all Muslims support terrorism when more Muslims start coming forward alerting authorities to what is taking place in their mosques, homes, and community centers.
I cannot adequately state the contempt I feel when immediately after Americans are slaughtered by Muslim terrorists, I see the family of the murderous Muslim surrounded by members of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) posing in front of a camera telling us how sweet their child was/is.
We are not in a culture war. We are in a war of ideology. If we are to prevail we not only must develop better vetting procedures, but we must resolve to do the unpopular. We must restrict entry and deport, and when necessary practice some form of internment. We must make public displays of searching mosques and Islamic businesses. We need surveillance of their daily lives and of their so-called religious leaders. We need surveillance in their schools and we need agents planted in every corner of their communities.
When Muslims have sufficient numbers, they will use our system of jurisprudence against us. They will elect greater numbers of their assembly to political office. And at that point how long before another charming, well-spoken elapid slithers into the public forum and is elected Commander-in-Chief?
If homosexual judges and homosexual sympathizers in judicial positions subvert the lawful, legitimate, Constitutional voter referendums California, what can we expect from Muslim jurists?
I’m advocating common sense. We are at war and key elements of government are playing “make nice” with the enemy. An analogy would be: if there are three glasses of iced tea in front of you and one glass is laced with a deadly poison but you could not tell which it was until you consumed it – would not the smart thing be to throw the three glasses away.
Is it not prudent to do the same with a people committed to global jihad?